And that's the whole point — what our musical choices say about who we are. And, more broadly, why we respond to music so deeply in the first place. The Telegraph article tried explaining that one, at least a little bit.Well, the Telegraph article did no such thing. This is aesthetic relativism with a vengeance! Pure narcissism. Let's reduce music to a little soundtrack to our lives. Sure, we can do it and apparently a lot of people have fun with that. But really? That's music? We respond to it because some fragments of it we can shoehorn into parts of our lives?
I don't know if it is merely because I have spent most of my life as a professional musician, but I have never had the inclination to think of music this way. Not to deny that some pieces of music can act on memory like Proust's madelaine did, recalling times past. But that's really not why I listen to music. For me it has exactly the opposite function and purpose: not to be absorbed into my life, but to take me out of myself. This is the precise meaning of the word ecstasy, to stand outside oneself. And that is a kind of magic so much more powerful than some song that makes you, you. Don't you think?
Music can take us somewhere -- else...
0 comments:
Post a Comment